A Scalia-less Court hears 2016's big abortion case; the post–Super Tuesday landscape (is a blighted hellscape for the GOP); how to think about the Apple/FBI battle.
Vox Sentences is written by Dylan Matthews and Dara Lind.
TOP NEWS
Undue burdens
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
-
The case, Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, challenges a law Texas passed in 2014 (the one famously filibustered by Wendy Davis). The law requires all abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at local hospitals and all clinics to be equipped for surgery (even if they didn't perform surgical abortions).
[SCOTUSBlog / Lyle Denniston]
Trump vs. Anti-Trump
John Moore/Getty Images
-
And it is realistically too late for Ben Carson, who announced today that his campaign wouldn't be going forward. On the other hand, he's not formally suspending it. It's not clear whether anything real will change, since he was kind of a nonfactor anyway.
[Vox / Dylan Matthews]
The 3 fights between Apple and the FBI
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
-
The argument over the lawsuit can get very muddled. Ben Thompson, at Stratechery, offers three ways to think about it: the case at hand (Farook's phone), the PR battle over protecting privacy, and the ongoing legal battle over encryption.
[Stratechery / Ben Thompson]
-
It's similar to other cases that the FBI has tried to pursue against Apple compelling phone unlocking. One FBI request from October 2015 was totally smacked down on Monday by a federal judge, James Orenstein, in a ruling that gave a lot of hope to Apple's defenders in the Farook case.
[Motherboard / Sarah Jeong]
MISCELLANEOUS
VERBATIM
.
WATCH THIS
Vox
Get Vox in your inbox!
Add your email to receive a daily newsletter from Vox breaking down the top stories of the day.
By signing up, you agree to our terms.