‘Election interference’ and ‘corruption’: Experts on Trump prosecution opening arguments
Prosecutors for the State of New York in their opening statement drew a direct line between the October 2016 "Access Hollywood" leaked audio and Donald Trump's alleged "hush money" payoff to two women, including the adult film actress Stormy Daniels, telling the jury it was "election fraud, pure and simple."
Legal experts are dissecting the prosecution's opening argument. Professor of law, MSNBC contributor and former FBI General Counsel Andrew Weissmann summed it up, saying New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg "squarely places the NY criminal trial in the election interference/corruption bucket-- exactly what the DC and GA indictments allege, just 4 years later."
"And the NY alleged 'cover up' is reminiscent of the two MAL [Mar-a-Lago] alleged obstruction schemes post-presidency, to keep prosecutors from uncovering evidence of that scheme," Weissmann added.
Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo late Monday morning in his 45-minute opening argument told jurors, "This case is about criminal conspiracy and a cover up," according to MSNBC's Joyce Vance.
READ MORE: ‘Rally Behind MAGA’: Trump Advocates Courthouse ‘Protests’ Nationwide
“The defendant, Donald Trump, orchestrated a criminal scheme to corrupt the 2016 presidential election,” Colangelo told jurors, CNN reports. “Then he covered up that criminal conspiracy by lying in his New York business records over and over and over again."
"This was a planned, coordinated long-running conspiracy to influence the 2016 election, to help Donald Trump get elected through illegal expenditures," Colangelo, a former U.S. Department of Justice Acting Associate Attorney General, told jurors.
“Another story about sexual infidelity, especially with a porn star, on the heels of the Access Hollywood tape would have been devastating to his campaign,” Colangelo added. “'So at Trump’s direction, Cohen negotiated the deal to buy Daniels’ story,' and prevent it from becoming public before the election."
"It was election fraud, pure and simple.”
Vance, an MSNBC legal analyst, professor of law and former U.S. Attorney, explains: "The scheme the prosecution is outlining is catch & kill to elect Trump-awful but lawful. Trump crossed the line into illegality when he created false business records to conceal his payments to Cohen to cover up the payments to Stormy Daniels."
READ MORE: Fox News Host Suggests Trump ‘Force’ Court to Throw Him in Jail – by Quoting Him
"It's always the cover up," she adds.
Professor of law and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman adds, the prosecution told jurors "a straight election-interference story."
Colangelo, Litman says, told jurors that Trump's then personal attorney Micheal Cohen "then discussed the [Stormy] situation with Trump who was adamant he did not want the story to come out. Another story...on the heels of the Access Hollywood tape would have been devastating to his campaign."
MSNBC legal contributor Katie Phang describes Colangelo's opening argument, saying he is "working methodically and chronologically through the conspiracy, identifying the main characters and their involvement. He speaks clearly and succintly [sic]."
Trump has been criminally indicted in four separate cases and is facing a total of 88 felony charges, including 34 in his New York criminal trial for alleged falsification of business records to hide payments of hush money to an adult film actress and one other woman, in an alleged effort to suppress their stories and protect his 2016 presidential campaign, which could be deemed election interference.
Watch an MSNBC clip below or at this link.
READ MORE: Gaetz: ‘Corrupt’ Republicans Could ‘Take a Bribe’ and Throw House to Dems, Blocking Trump Run