Re: Karanka
Mario kempes 78El MayorI've never ever known a club that's had to keep a manager employed because they can't afford to sack them.. Never... Make no mistake Dan he's totally on thin ice so I think you need to grasp that he will be sacked if things don't improve and pretty much soon as well.TheresonlyonestanleySo your telling me all the jude money has ran out... my point is the money we spend on players wages or transfer fees I would rather it went on a manager who can actually motivate players and knows how to use the 5 sub ruling to his advantage. I'm yet to see karanka out smart his opposite manager..games we have won are down to luck and we could of quite easily lost them.
/head desk
How many times do people need to hear that the Jude money is keeping the effing club afloat?
Do you think they forward funded the balance of the transfer money (and Che’s to boot) so that they could look at a wad of cash in the bank?
To get rid of Karanka means a payoff. To bring in a manager employed elsewhere means a payoff. We’re talking millions potentially. People need to grasp that this isn’t the time for blues to once again waste millions.
Two things there though - you wouldn't know if a club had to keep a manager because they couldn't afford to sack him, because he'd still be there. And these are unprecedented times - how do you shell out £ millions so soon into a contract if you have no income?