TORA BORA REVISITED:
HOW WE FAILED TO GET BIN LADEN A Report To Members, Committee on Foreign Relations 2009 John F. Kerry, Chairman
On October 7, 2001, U.S. aircraft began bombing the
training bases and strongholds of Al Qaeda and the ruling
Taliban across Afghanistan. The leaders who sent murderers to
attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon less than a
month earlier and the rogue government that provided them
sanctuary were running for their lives. President George W.
Bush's expression of America's desire to get Osama bin Laden
``dead or alive'' seemed about to come true.
Two months later, American civilian and military leaders
celebrated what they viewed as a lasting victory with the
selection of Hamid Karzai as the country's new hand-picked
leader. The war had been conceived as a swift campaign with a
single objective: defeat the Taliban and destroy Al Qaeda by
capturing or killing bin Laden and other key leaders. A unique
combination of airpower, Central Intelligence Agency and
special operations forces teams and indigenous allies had swept
the Taliban from power and ousted Al Qaeda from its safe haven
while keeping American deaths to a minimum. But even in the
initial glow, there were concerns: The mission had failed to
capture or kill bin Laden.
Removing the Al Qaeda leader from the battlefield eight
years ago would not have eliminated the worldwide extremist
threat. But the decisions that opened the door for his escape
to Pakistan allowed bin Laden to emerge as a potent symbolic
figure who continues to attract a steady flow of money and
inspire fanatics worldwide. The failure to finish the job
represents a lost opportunity that forever altered the course
of the conflict in Afghanistan and the future of international
terrorism, leaving the American people more vulnerable to
terrorism, laying the foundation for today's protracted Afghan
insurgency and inflaming the internal strife now endangering
Pakistan. Al Qaeda shifted its locus across the border into
Pakistan, where it has trained extremists linked to numerous
plots, including the July 2005 transit bombings in London and
two recent aborted attacks involving people living in the
United States. The terrorist group's resurgence in Pakistan has
coincided with the rising violence orchestrated in Afghanistan
by the Taliban, whose leaders also escaped only to re-emerge to
direct today's increasingly lethal Afghan insurgency.
This failure and its enormous consequences were not
inevitable. By early December 2001, Bin Laden's world had
shrunk to a complex of caves and tunnels carved into a
mountainous section of eastern Afghanistan known as Tora Bora.
Cornered in some of the most forbidding terrain on earth, he
and several hundred of his men, the largest concentration of Al
Qaeda fighters of the war, endured relentless pounding by
American aircraft, as many as 100 air strikes a day. One
15,000-pound bomb, so huge it had to be rolled out the back of
a C-130 cargo plane, shook the mountains for miles. It seemed
only a matter of time before U.S. troops and their Afghan
allies overran the remnants of Al Qaeda hunkered down in the
thin, cold air at 14,000 feet.
Bin Laden expected to die. His last will and testament,
written on December 14, reflected his fatalism. ``Allah
commended to us that when death approaches any of us that we
make a bequest to parents and next of kin and to Muslims as a
whole,'' he wrote, according to a copy of the will that
surfaced later and is regarded as authentic. ``Allah bears
witness that the love of jihad and death in the cause of Allah
has dominated my life and the verses of the sword permeated
every cell in my heart, `and fight the pagans all together as
they fight you all together.' How many times did I wake up to
find myself reciting this holy verse!'' He instructed his wives
not to remarry and apologized to his children for devoting
himself to jihad.
But the Al Qaeda leader would live to fight another day.
Fewer than 100 American commandos were on the scene with their
Afghan allies, and calls for reinforcements to launch an
assault were rejected. Requests were also turned down for U.S.
troops to block the mountain paths leading to sanctuary a few
miles away in Pakistan. The vast array of American military
power, from sniper teams to the most mobile divisions of the
Marine Corps and the Army, was kept on the sidelines. Instead,
the U.S. command chose to rely on airstrikes and untrained
Afghan militias to attack bin Laden and on Pakistan's loosely
organized Frontier Corps to seal his escape routes. On or
around December 16, two days after writing his will, bin Laden
and an entourage of bodyguards walked unmolested out of Tora
Bora and disappeared into Pakistan's unregulated tribal area.
Most analysts say he is still there today.
The decision not to deploy American forces to go after bin
Laden or block his escape was made by Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld and his top commander, Gen. Tommy Franks, the
architects of the unconventional Afghan battle plan known as
Operation Enduring Freedom. Rumsfeld said at the time that he
was concerned that too many U.S. troops in Afghanistan would
create an anti-American backlash and fuel a widespread
insurgency. Reversing the recent American military orthodoxy
known as the Powell doctrine, the Afghan model emphasized
minimizing the U.S. presence by relying on small, highly mobile
teams of special operations troops and CIA paramilitary
operatives working with the Afghan opposition. Even when his
own commanders and senior intelligence officials in Afghanistan
and Washington argued for dispatching more U.S. troops, Franks
refused to deviate from the plan.
There were enough U.S. troops in or near Afghanistan to
execute the classic sweep-and-block maneuver required to attack
bin Laden and try to prevent his escape. It would have been a
dangerous fight across treacherous terrain, and the injection
of more U.S. troops and the resulting casualties would have
contradicted the risk-averse, ``light footprint'' model
formulated by Rumsfeld and Franks. But commanders on the scene
and elsewhere in Afghanistan argued that the risks were worth
the reward.
After bin Laden's escape, some military and intelligence
analysts and the press criticized the Pentagon's failure to
mount a full-scale attack despite the tough rhetoric by
President Bush. Franks, Vice President Dick Cheney and others
defended the decision, arguing that the intelligence was
inconclusive about the Al Qaeda leader's location. But the
review of existing literature, unclassified government records
and interviews with central participants underlying this report
removes any lingering doubts and makes it clear that Osama bin
Laden was within our grasp at Tora Bora.
For example, the CIA and Delta Force commanders who spent
three weeks at Tora Bora as well as other intelligence and
military sources are certain he was there. Franks' second-in-
command during the war, retired Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong, wrote
in his autobiography that bin Laden was ``definitely there when
we hit the caves''--a statement he retracted when the failure
became a political issue. Most authoritatively, the official
history of the U.S. Special Operations Command determined that
bin Laden was at Tora Bora. ``All source reporting corroborated
his presence on several days from 9-14 December,'' said a
declassified version of the history, which was based on
accounts of commanders and intelligence officials and published
without fanfare two years ago.
The reasons behind the failure to capture or kill Osama bin
Laden and its lasting consequences are examined over three
sections in this report. The first section traces bin Laden's
path from southern Afghanistan to the mountains of Tora Bora
and lays out new and previous evidence that he was there. The
second explores new information behind the decision not to
launch an assault. The final section examines the military
options that might have led to his capture or death at Tora
Bora and the ongoing impact of the failure to bring him back
``dead or alive.''
1. Flight to Tora Bora
Whether Osama bin Laden was at Tora Bora in late 2001
has been the topic of heated debate since he escaped
Afghanistan to the tribal belt of Pakistan. The
evidence is convincing that the Al Qaeda leader was in
the mountains of eastern Afghanistan in that critical
period. The information comes from U.S. military
officers at Tora Bora, from detainees who were in the
camps with bin Laden, from the senior CIA officer in
Afghanistan at the time, and from the official history
of the special operations forces. Based on that
evidence, it is clear that the Al Qaeda leader was
within reach of U.S. troops three months after the
attacks on New York and Washington.
In the middle of August 2001, two Pakistani nuclear
scientists sat down in a mud-walled compound on the outskirts
of Kandahar in southern Afghanistan, the spiritual and tactical
headquarters of Taliban fundamentalists who controlled most of
the country. Seated with them were bin Laden and Ayman al-
Zawahiri, the Egyptian surgeon who was his chief deputy and
strategist. The four men spent two days discussing Al Qaeda's
determination to obtain nuclear weapons before bin Laden and
Zawahiri abruptly excused themselves and left the compound.
Before departing, bin Laden promised the Pakistanis that
something momentous was going to happen soon.
American intelligence had already picked up indications
that something momentous was coming. George Tenet, who was
Director of Central Intelligence at the time, later testified
before the 9/11 Commission that the ``system was blinking red''
from July 2001 until the actual attacks. The first reports of
possible attacks on the United States had been picked up in
June and the warnings increased steadily from then on. On July
12, Tenet went to Capitol Hill to provide a top-secret briefing
for Senators about the rising threat of an imminent attack.
Only a handful of Senators turned up in S-407, the secure
conference room in the Capitol, to hear the CIA Director warn
that he was extremely worried that bin Laden and Al Qaeda were
preparing an attack on U.S. soil. Tenet told them the attack
was not a question of if, but when.
Less than a month later, on August 6, President Bush's
daily briefing repeated the warning under the ominous headline
``Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in U.S.'' The text described
previous plots carried out by Al Qaeda against American targets
overseas and said the FBI had uncovered ``patterns of
suspicious activity in this country consistent with
preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks,
including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New
York.'' At the time, President Bush later told the 9/11
Commission that he regarded the warning as historical in
nature. The Commission's voluminous report said its
investigators ``found no indication of any further discussion
before September 11 among the President and his top advisers of
the possibility of a threat of an Al Qaeda attack in the United
States.''
Bin Laden's movements in the days surrounding September 11
remain sketchy. Some facts have emerged from reputable
journalists, U.S. military and intelligence sources and Afghans
who said they saw the Al Qaeda leader at various points along
his path to Tora Bora. He was spotted in Khost in eastern
Afghanistan around September 11. On November 8, he and Zawahiri
met in Kabul with Hamid Mir, a respected Pakistani journalist.
By then, U.S. special operations forces and Northern Alliance
troops were closing in on the Afghan capital. The Al Qaeda
leaders had risked the trip to attend a memorial service
honoring the Uzbek militant leader Juma Khan Namangani, who had
been killed in a U.S. airstrike. Before Kabul fell, bin Laden
and Zawahiri traveled 5 hours east to the ancient trading
center of Jalalabad. From there, by all reliable accounts, they
went to ground at Tora Bora, one of bin Laden's old haunts from
the days of fighting the Soviets in the 1980s.
Tora Bora is a district about 30 miles southeast of
Jalalabad. Rather than a single place, the name covers a
fortress-like section of the White Mountains that stretches
about six miles long and six miles wide across a collection of
narrow valleys, snow-covered ridgelines and jagged peaks
reaching 14,000 feet. During the 1980s, when he was fighting
the Soviets in Afghanistan, bin Laden turned the site into a
formidable stronghold. He built a rough road from Jalalabad and
brought in heavy equipment to fortify the natural caves and dig
new ones. He supervised the excavation of connecting tunnels so
fighters could move unseen between locations in the fights
against Soviet troops.
After the defeat of the Soviet Union in 1989, bin Laden
left Afghanistan and eventually set up the operations of his
fledgling terrorist organization in the northeastern African
nation of Sudan. After pressure from the United States, Sudan
expelled bin Laden in 1996 and he flew with his wives and
children to Jalalabad on a chartered jet. Upon his return to
Afghanistan, bin Laden began expanding the fortress at Tora
Bora, building base camps at higher elevations for himself, his
wives and numerous children, and other senior Al Qaeda figures.
Some rooms were reported to be concealed 350 feet inside the
granite peaks. The mountainsides leading to those upper reaches
were steep and pitted with well-built bunkers cloaked in
camouflage. In the years that followed, Bin Laden got to know
the surrounding geography well from spending hours on long
hikes with his children. His familiarity with the worn trails
used over the centuries by traders and smugglers to traverse
the few miles into Pakistan would serve him well.
The United States rightly anticipated that bin Laden would
make his last stand at Tora Bora. The precise dates of his
arrival and departure are hard to pin down, but it's clear that
U.S. intelligence picked up his trail well before he got there.
The CIA had evidence that bin Laden was headed for the mountain
redoubt by early November, according to Tenet, the former CIA
Director. Outside experts like Peter Bergen, the last American
to interview bin Laden, estimate that he arrived by the end of
November, along with 1,000 to 1,500 hardened fighters and
bodyguards. In a television interview on November 29, 2001,
Vice President Cheney said he believed the Al Qaeda leader was
in the general area of Tora Bora. ``He's got a large number of
fighters with him probably, a fairly secure personal security
force that he has some degree of confidence in, and he'll have
to try to leave, that is, he may depart for other territory,
but that's not quite as easy as it would have been a few months
ago,'' Cheney said.
The Sheikh Arrives
Bin Laden's presence was more than conjecture. A major with
the Army's Delta Force, who is now retired and uses the pen
name Dalton Fury, was the senior U.S. military officer at Tora
Bora, commanding about 90 special operations troops and support
personnel. He and his fellow commandos from the elite and
secretive Delta Force arrived in early December, setting up
headquarters in a former schoolhouse near the mountains
alongside a handful of CIA operatives who were already there.
The Americans were there to direct airstrikes on Tora Bora and
work with Afghan militias assembled by two local warlords who
had been paid by the CIA to help flush out bin Laden and the Al
Qaeda contingent. The Delta Force soldiers were disguised to
blend in with the Afghan militia, wearing local clothing,
growing bushy beards and sometimes carrying the same types of
weapons.
Fury recounted his experiences in a book, Kill Bin Laden,
which was published in 2008. He expanded on them in interviews
with committee staff. Both the book and the interviews left no
doubt that Fury's team knew bin Laden was holed up at Tora Bora
and that he was eager to go get him. In the interviews, he
explained that Al Qaeda fighters arrayed in the mountains used
unsecure radios, which meant their communications were easily
intercepted by his team and by a sophisticated listening post a
few miles from the mountain. As a result, the Delta Force and
CIA operatives had real-time eavesdropping capabilities on Al
Qaeda almost from their arrival, allowing them to track
movements and gauge the effectiveness of the bombing. Even more
valuable, a few days after arriving, one of the CIA operatives
picked up a radio from a dead Al Qaeda fighter. The radio gave
the Americans a clear channel into the group's communications
on the mountain. Bin Laden's voice was often picked up, along
with frequent comments about the presence of the man referred
to by his followers as ``the sheikh.''
Fury, who still uses his pen name to protect his identity,
said there was no doubt the voice on the radios was bin Laden.
``The CIA had a guy with them called Jalal and he was the
foremost expert on bin Laden's voice,'' he said. ``He worked on
bin Laden's voice for seven years and he knew him better than
anyone else in the West. To him, it was very clear that bin
Laden was there on the mountain.''
Another special operations expert who speaks fluent Arabic
and heard the intercepted communications in real time in
Afghanistan told the committee staff that it was clearly bin
Laden's voice. He had studied the Al Qaeda leader's speech
pattern and word choices before the war and he said he
considered the communications a perfect match.
Afghan villagers who were providing food and other supplies
for the Al Qaeda fighters at Tora Bora also confirmed bin
Laden's presence. Fury said some of the villagers were paid by
the CIA for information about precise locations of clusters of
fighters that could be targeted for bombing runs. The locals
also provided fragmentary information on bin Laden's movements
within the Al Qaeda compound, though the outsiders never got
near the sheikh. The cooperating villagers were given
rudimentary global positioning devices and told to push a
button at any spot where they saw significant numbers of
fighters or arms caches. When the locals turned in the devices
to collect their payments, the GPS coordinates recorded by
pushing the buttons were immediately passed along to targeting
officers, who programmed the coordinates into bombing runs.
For several days in early December, Fury's special ops
troops moved up the mountains in pairs with fighters from the
Afghan militias. The Americans used GPS devices and laser range
finders to pinpoint caves and pockets of enemy fighters for the
bombers. The Delta Force units were unable to hold any high
ground because the Afghans insisted on retreating to their base
at the bottom of the mountains each night, leaving the
Americans alone inside Al Qaeda territory. Still, it was clear
from what they could see and what they were hearing in the
intercepted conversations that relentless bombing was taking
its toll.
On December 9, a C-130 cargo plane dropped a 15,000-pound
bomb, known as a Daisy Cutter, on the Tora Bora complex. The
weapon had not been used since Vietnam, and there were early
fears that its impact had not been as great as expected. But
later reports confirmed that the bomb struck with massive
force. A captured Al Qaeda fighter who was there later told
American interrogators that men deep in caves had been
vaporized in what he called ``a hideous explosion.'' That day
and others, Fury described intercepting radio communications in
which Al Qaeda fighters called for the ``red truck to move
wounded'' and frantic pleas from a fighter to his commander,
saying ``cave too hot, can't reach others.''
At one point, the Americans listened on the radio as bin
Laden exhorted his men to keep fighting, though he apologized
``for getting them trapped and pounded by American
airstrikes.'' On December 11, Fury said bin Laden was heard on
the radio telling his men that he had let them down and it was
okay to surrender. Fury hoped the battle was over, but he would
soon determine that it was part of an elaborate ruse to allow
Al Qaeda fighters to slip out of Tora Bora for Pakistan.
Fury is adamant that bin Laden was at Tora Bora until mid-
December. ``There is no doubt that bin Laden was in Tora Bora
during the fighting,'' he wrote in Kill Bin Laden. ``From
alleged sightings to the radio intercepts to news reports from
various countries, it was repeatedly confirmed that he was
there.''
Other Voices, Same Conclusion
Fury was not alone in his conviction. In some cases,
confirmation that bin Laden was at Tora Bora has come from
detainees at Guantanamo Bay. A ``summary of evidence'' prepared
by the Pentagon for the trial of an unnamed detainee says
flatly that the man ``assisted in the escape of Osama bin Laden
from Tora Bora.'' The detainee was described as one of bin
Laden's commanders in the fight against the Soviets. The
document, which was released to the Associated Press in 2005
through a Freedom of Information request, was the first
definitive statement by the Pentagon that the mastermind of 9/
11 was at Tora Bora during the American bombing before slipping
away into Pakistan.
Another confirmation came from the senior CIA paramilitary
commander in Afghanistan at the time. Gary Berntsen was working
at the CIA's counterterrorist center in October 2001 when his
boss summoned him to the front office and told him, ``Gary, I
want you killing the enemy immediately.'' Berntsen left the
next day for Afghanistan, where he assumed leadership of the
CIA's paramilitary operation against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
His primary target was bin Laden, and he was confident that the
Al Qaeda leader would make his last stand at Tora Bora. His
suspicions were confirmed when he learned bin Laden's voice had
been intercepted there.
From the outset, Berntsen says he was skeptical about
relying on Afghan militias ``cobbled together at the last
minute'' to capture or kill the man who ordered the 9/11
attacks. ``I'd made it clear in my reports that our Afghan
allies were hardly anxious to get at al Qaeda in Tora Bora,''
he wrote in his own book, Jawbreaker, which was published in
late 2005. He also knew that the special operations troops and
CIA operatives on the scene were not enough to stop bin Laden
from escaping across the mountain passes. In the book, Berntsen
uses exclamation points to vent his fears that the most wanted
man in the world was about to slip out of our grasp.
``We needed U.S. soldiers on the ground!'' he wrote. ``I'd
sent my request for 800 U.S. Army Rangers and was still waiting
for a response. I repeated to anyone at headquarters who would
listen: We need Rangers now! The opportunity to get bin Laden
and his men is slipping away!!''
At one point, Berntsen recalled an argument at a CIA
guesthouse in Kabul with Maj. Gen. Dell Dailey, the commander
of U.S. special operations forces in Afghanistan at the time.
Berntsen said he renewed his demand that American troops be
dispatched to Tora Bora immediately. Following orders from
Franks at U.S. Central Command (CentCom) headquarters at
MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida, Dailey refused to
deploy U.S. troops, explaining that he feared alienating Afghan
allies.
``I don't give a damn about offending our allies!''
Berntsen shouted. ``I only care about eliminating al Qaeda and
delivering bin Laden's head in a box!''
Dailey said the military's position was firm and Berntsen
replied, ``Screw that!''
For those like Franks, who later maintained that bin Laden
might not have been at Tora Bora, Berntsen is respectfully
scornful. ``We could have ended it all there,'' he said in an
interview.
Berntsen's views were generally shared by Gary Schroen,
another senior CIA operative in Afghanistan. Schroen, who had
spent years cultivating ties to Afghanistan's opposition
elements, bemoaned the reliance on local tribal leaders to go
after bin Laden and guard escape routes. ``Unfortunately, many
of those people proved to be loyal to bin Laden and
sympathizers with the Taliban and they allowed the key guys to
escape,'' Schroen, who retired from the CIA, said in a
television interview in May 2005. He added that he had no doubt
that bin Laden was at Tora Bora.
Franks' second-in-command during the war, General DeLong,
was convinced that bin Laden was at Tora Bora. In his memoir,
Inside CentCom, DeLong described the massive, three-week
bombing campaign aimed at killing Al Qaeda fighters in their
caves at Tora Bora. ``We were hot on Osama bin Laden's trail,''
he wrote. ``He was definitely there when we hit the caves.
Every day during the bombing, Rumsfeld asked me, `Did we get
him? Did we get him?' I would have to answer that we didn't
know.'' The retired general said that intelligence suggested
bin Laden had been wounded during the bombings before he
escaped to Pakistan, a conclusion reached by numerous
journalists, too.
DeLong argued that large numbers of U.S. troops could not
be dispatched because the area surrounding Tora Bora was
controlled by tribes hostile to the United States and other
outsiders. But he recognized that the Pakistani Frontier Corps,
asked to block any escape attempt by bin Laden, was ill-
equipped for the job. ``To make matters worse, this tribal area
was sympathetic to bin Laden,'' he wrote. ``He was the richest
man in the area, and he had funded these people for years.''
The book was published in September 2004, a year after
DeLong retired from the Army. That fall, the failure to capture
or kill bin Laden had become an issue in the presidential
campaign. Franks had retired from the Army in 2003 and he often
defended the events at Tora Bora. On October 19, 2004, he wrote
an opinion article in The New York Times saying that
intelligence on the Al Qaeda leader's location had been
inconclusive. ``We don't know to this day whether Mr. bin Laden
was at Tora Bora in December 2001,'' he wrote. ``Some
intelligence sources said he was; others indicated he was in
Pakistan at the time; still others suggested he was in Kashmir.
Tora Bora was teeming with Taliban and Qaeda operatives, many
of whom were killed or captured, but Mr. bin Laden was never
within our grasp.''
Two weeks after the Franks article was published and barely
two months after publication of his own book, DeLong reversed
the conclusion from his autobiography and echoed his former
boss in an opinion article on November 1 in The Wall Street
Journal. After defending the decision to rely heavily on local
militia and the Pakistani Frontier Corps, DeLong wrote:
``Finally, most people fail to realize that it is quite
possible that bin Laden was never in Tora Bora to begin with.
There exists no concrete intel to prove that he was there at
the time.''
DeLong said in an interview with committee staff that the
contradiction between his book and the opinion article was the
result of murky intelligence. ``What I put in the book was what
the intel said at the time,'' he said. ``The intel is not
always right. I read it that he was there. We even heard that
he was injured. Later intel was that he may or may not have
been there. Did anybody have eyeballs on him? No. The intel
stated that he was there at the time, but we got shot in the
face by bad intel many times.''
DeLong amplified the reasons for not sending American
troops after bin Laden. ``The real reason we didn't go in with
U.S. troops was that we hadn't had the election yet,'' he said
in the staff interview, a reference to the installation of
Hamid Karzai as the interim leader of Afghanistan. ``We didn't
want to have U.S. forces fighting before Karzai was in power.
We wanted to create a stable country and that was more
important than going after bin Laden at the time.''
``A Controversial Fight''
Military and intelligence officers at Tora Bora have
provided ample evidence that bin Laden was there. Al Qaeda
detainees have maintained that he was there. And the Pentagon's
own summary of evidence in the case against a former senior
jihadi commander at Guantanamo Bay concluded the detainee
helped bin Laden escape. But the most authoritative and
definitive unclassified government document on bin Laden's
location in December 2001 is the official history of the United
States Special Operations Command.
The Special Operations Command, based alongside CentCom at
MacDill Air Force Base, oversees the special forces of the
Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps. The heavy reliance on
special operations forces during the first stages of the Afghan
campaign meant that the command played a central role in
executing the war plan. Its units included the Delta Force team
on the scene at Tora Bora. In preparing the official history of
the command, a team of historians working for the command
interviewed military and intelligence officials from every
branch of the armed forces. The unclassified version of the
history was published in 2007 and includes a lengthy section on
the operations at Tora Bora.
The section opens by saying that bin Laden and a large
contingent of Al Qaeda troops had fled the area around Kabul
for Nangahar Province and its provincial capital, Jalalabad, in
early November. ``Analysts within both the CIA and CentCom
correctly speculated that UBL would make a stand along the
northern peaks of the Spin Ghar Mountains at a place then
called Tora Gora,'' says the history. ``Tora Bora, as it was
redubbed in December, had been a major stronghold of AQ for
years and provided routes into Pakistan.'' The history said bin
Laden had ``undoubtedly'' chosen to make his last stand there
prior to the onset of winter, along with between 500 and 2,000
others, before escaping into Pakistan.
In the concluding passage assessing the battle of Tora
Bora, the historians from the Special Operations Command wrote:
``What has since been determined with reasonable certainty was
that UBL was indeed at Tora Bora in December 2001. All source
reporting corroborated his presence on several days from 9-14
December. The fact that SOF (special operations forces) came as
close to capturing or killing UBL as U.S. forces have to date
makes Tora Bora a controversial fight. Given the commitment of
fewer than 100 American personnel, U.S. forces proved unable to
block egress routes from Tora Bora south into Pakistan, the
route that UBL most likely took.''
Franks declined to respond to any questions about the
discrepancies about bin Laden's location or the conclusion of
the Special Operations Command historians. ``We really don't
have time for this,'' one of his aides, retired Col. Michael T.
Hayes, wrote in an email to the committee staff. ``Focused on
the future, not the past. Gen Franks made his decisions, based
on the intel at the time.''
2. The Afghan Model: A Flawed Masterpiece
Or Just Flawed?
Writing in Foreign Affairs in the spring of 2002, the
military analyst Michael O'Hanlon declared Operation
Enduring Freedom ``a masterpiece of military creativity
and finesse.'' The operation had been designed on the
fly and O'Hanlon praised Rumsfeld, Franks and CIA
Director George Tenet for devising a war plan that
combined limited American power and the Afghan
opposition to defeat the Taliban and Al Qaeda with only
30 U.S. casualties in the first five months. But
O'Hanlon tempered his praise, calling the plan ``a
flawed masterpiece'' because of the failure to capture
or kill bin Laden and other enemy leaders. The
resurgence of the Taliban and Al Qaeda in recent years,
and the turmoil they have wrought in Afghanistan and
Pakistan, raise the question of whether the plan was a
flawed masterpiece--or simply flawed.
The Afghan model required elite teams of American commandos
and CIA paramilitary operatives to form alliances with Afghans
who opposed the Taliban and had the militias to help topple the
religious fundamentalists. Some of these Afghans were
legitimate ethnic and tribal leaders who chafed at the
restrictions of the Taliban and the sanctuary it provided to Al
Qaeda. Others were allies of convenience, Taliban rivals who
held power by force and paid their men by collecting tolls and
taxes on legitimate commerce and trafficking in heroin. By
providing money and weapons, the U.S. forces helped the
warlords destroy their rivals and expand their personal power.
Many later entered the Afghan government and remain influential
figures. The strategy was a short cut to victory that would
have consequences for long-term stability in Afghanistan.
When it came to bin Laden, the special operations forces
relied on two relatively minor warlords from the Jalalabad
area. Haji Hazarat Ali had a fourth-grade education and a
reputation as a bully. He had fought the Soviets as a teenager
in the 1980s and later joined the Taliban for a time. The
other, Haji Zaman Ghamsharik, was a wealthy drug smuggler who
had been persuaded by the United States to return from France.
Ghamsharik also had fought the Soviets, but when the Taliban
came to power, he had gone into exile in France. Together, they
fielded a force of about 2,000 men, but there were questions
from the outset about the competence and loyalties of the
fighters. The two warlords and their men distrusted each other
and both groups appeared to distrust their American allies.
The Delta Force commandos had doubts about the willingness
and ability of the Afghan militias to wage a genuine assault on
Tora Bora almost from the outset. Those concerns were
underscored each time the Afghans insisted on retreating from
the mountains as darkness fell. But the suspicions were
confirmed by events that started on the afternoon of December
11.
Haji Ghamsharik approached Fury and told him that Al Qaeda
fighters wanted to surrender. He said all they needed to end
the siege was a 12-hour ceasefire to allow the fighters to
climb down the mountains and turn in their weapons. Intercepted
radio chatter seemed to confirm that the fighters had lost
their resolve under the relentless bombing and wanted to give
up, but Fury remained suspicious.
``This is the greatest day in the history of Afghanistan,''
Ghamsharik told Fury.
``Why is that?'' asked the dubious American officer.
``Because al Qaeda is no more,'' he said. ``Bin Laden is
finished.''
The Special Operations Command history records that CentCom
refused to back the ceasefire, suspecting a ruse, but it said
the special ops forces agreed reluctantly to an overnight pause
in the bombing to avoid killing the surrendering Al Qaeda
fighters. Ghamsharik negotiated by radio with representatives
of Al Qaeda. He initially told Fury that a large number of
Algerians wanted to surrender. Then he said that he could turn
over the entire Al Qaeda leadership. Fury's suspicions
increased at such a bold promise. By the morning of December
12, no Al Qaeda fighters had appeared and the Delta Force
commander concluded that the whole episode was a hoax.
Intelligence estimates are that as many as 800 Al Qaeda
fighters escaped that night, but bin Laden stuck it out.
Despite the unreliability of his Afghan allies, Fury
refused to give up. He plotted ways to use his 40 Delta Force
soldiers and the handful of other special ops troops under his
command to go after bin Laden on their own. One of the plans
was to go at bin Laden from the one direction he would never
anticipate, the southern side of the mountains. ``We want to
come in on the back door,'' Fury explained later, pointing on a
map to the side of the Tora Bora enclave facing Pakistan. The
peaks there rose to 14,000 feet and the valleys and precipitous
mountain passes were already deep in snow. ``The original plan
that we sent up through our higher headquarters, Delta Force
wants to come in over the mountain with oxygen, coming from the
Pakistan side, over the mountains and come in and get a drop on
bin Laden from behind.'' The audacious assault was nixed
somewhere up the chain of command. Undeterred, Fury suggested
dropping hundreds of landmines along the passes leading to
Pakistan to block bin Laden's escape. ``First guy blows his leg
off, everybody else stops,'' he said. ``That allows aircraft
overhead to find them. They see all these heat sources out
there. Okay, there is a big large group of Al Qaeda moving
south. They can engage that.'' That proposal was rejected, too.
About the time Fury was desperately concocting scenarios
for going after bin Laden and getting rejections from up the
chain of command, Franks was well into planning for the next
war--the invasion of Iraq.
A Shift in Attention and Resources
On November 21, 2001, President Bush put his arm on Defense
Secretary Rumsfeld as they were leaving a National Security
Council meeting at the White House. ``I need to see you,'' the
President said. It was 72 days after the 9/11 attacks and just
a week after the fall of Kabul. But Bush already had new plans.
According to Bob Woodward's book, Plan of Attack, the
President said to Rumsfeld: ``What kind of a war plan do you
have for Iraq? How do you feel about the war plan for Iraq?''
Then the President told Woodward he recalled saying: ``Let's
get started on this. And get Tommy Franks looking at what it
would take to protect America by removing Saddam Hussein if we
have to.'' Back at the Pentagon, Rumsfeld convened a meeting of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff to draft a message for Franks asking
for a new assessment of a war with Iraq. The existing
operations plan had been created in 1998 and it hinged on
assembling the kind of massive international coalition used in
Desert Storm in 1991.
In his memoir, American General, Franks later described
getting the November 21 telephone call from Rumsfeld relaying
the President's orders while he was sitting in his office at
MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. Franks and one of his aides
were working on air support for the Afghan units being
assembled to push into the mountains surrounding Tora Bora.
Rumsfeld said the President wanted options for war with Iraq.
Franks said the existing plan was out of date and that a new
one should include lessons about precision weapons and the use
of special operations forces learned in Afghanistan.
``Okay, Tom,'' Rumsfeld said, according to Franks. ``Please
dust it off and get back to me next week.''
Franks described his reaction to Rumsfeld's orders this
way: ``Son of a bitch. No rest for the weary.''
For critics of the Bush administration's commitment to
Afghanistan, the shift in focus just as Franks and his senior
aides were literally working on plans for the attacks on Tora
Bora represents a dramatic turning point that allowed a
sustained victory in Afghanistan to slip through our fingers.
Almost immediately, intelligence and military planning
resources were transferred to begin planning on the next war in
Iraq. Though Fury, Berntsen and others in the field did not
know what was happening back at CentCom, the drain in resources
and shift in attention would affect them and the future course
of the U.S. campaign in Afghanistan.
``We're Going to Lose Our Prey''
In his memoir, At the Center of the Storm, former CIA
Director Tenet said it was evident from the start that aerial
bombing would not be enough to get bin Laden at Tora Bora.
Troops needed to be in the caves themselves, he wrote, but the
Afghan militiamen were ``distinctly reluctant'' to put
themselves in harm's way and there were not enough Americans on
the scene. He said that senior CIA officials lobbied hard for
inserting U.S. troops. Henry Crumpton, the head of special
operations for the CIA's counterterrorism operation and chief
of its Afghan strategy, made direct requests to Franks.
Crumpton had told him that the back door to Pakistan was open
and urged Franks to move more than 1,000 Marines who had set up
a base near Kandahar to Tora Bora to block escape routes. But
the CentCom commander rejected the idea, saying it would take
weeks to get a large enough U.S. contingent on the scene and
bin Laden might disappear in the meantime.
At the end of November, Crumpton went to the White House to
brief President Bush and Vice President Cheney and repeated the
message that he had delivered to Franks. Crumpton warned the
President that the Afghan campaign's primary goal of capturing
bin Laden was in jeopardy because of the military's reliance on
Afghan militias at Tora Bora. Crumpton showed the President
where Tora Bora was located in the White Mountains and
described the caves and tunnels that riddled the region.
Crumpton questioned whether the Pakistani forces would be able
to seal off the escape routes and pointed out that the promised
Pakistani troops had not arrived yet. In addition, the CIA
officer told the President that the Afghan forces at Tora Bora
were ``tired and cold'' and ``they're just not invested in
getting bin Laden.''
According to author Ron Suskind in The One Percent
Solution, Crumpton sensed that his earlier warnings to Franks
and others at the Pentagon had not been relayed the President.
So Crumpton went further, telling Bush that ``we're going to
lose our prey if we're not careful.'' He recommended that the
Marines or other U.S. troops be rushed to Tora Bora.
``How bad off are these Afghani forces, really?'' asked
Bush. ``Are they up to the job?
``Definitely not, Mr. President,'' Crumpton replied.
``Definitely not.''
Flight from Tora Bora
On December 14, the day bin Laden finished his will, Dalton
Fury finally convinced Ali and his men to stay overnight in one
of the canyons that they had captured during daylight. Over the
next three days, the Afghan militia and their American advisers
moved steadily through the canyons, calling in airstrikes and
taking out lingering pockets of fighters. The resistance seemed
to have vanished, prompting Ali to declare victory on December
17. Most of the Tora Bora complex was abandoned and many of the
caves and tunnels were buried in debris. Only about 20
stragglers were taken prisoner. The consensus was that Al Qaeda
fighters who had survived the fierce bombing had escaped into
Pakistan or melted into the local population. Bin Laden was
nowhere to be found. Two days later, Fury and his Delta Force
colleagues left Tora Bora, hoping that someone would eventually
find bin Laden buried in one of the caves.
There was no body because bin Laden did not die at Tora
Bora. Later U.S. intelligence reports and accounts by
journalists and others said that he and a contingent of
bodyguards departed Tora Bora on December 16. With help from
Afghans and Pakistanis who had been paid in advance, the group
made its way on foot and horseback across the mountain passes
and into Pakistan without encountering any resistance.
The Special Operations Command history noted that there
were not enough U.S. troops to prevent the escape,
acknowledging that the failure to capture or kill bin Laden
made Tora Bora a controversial battle. But Franks argued that
Tora was a success and he praised both the Afghan militias and
the Pakistanis who were supposed to have protected the border.
``I think it was a good operation,'' he said in an interview
for the PBS show Frontline on the first anniversary of the
Afghan war. ``Many people have said, `Well, gosh, you know bin
Laden got away.' I have yet to see anything that proves bin
Laden or whomever was there. That's not to say they weren't,
but I've not seen proof that they were there.''
Bin Laden himself later acknowledged that he was at Tora
Bora, boasting about how he and Zawahiri survived the heavy
bombing along with 300 fighters before escaping. ``The
bombardment was round-the-clock and the warplanes continued to
fly over us day and night,'' he said in an audio tape released
on February 11, 2003. ``Planes poured their lava on us,
particularly after accomplishing their main missions in
Afghanistan.''
In the aftermath of bin Laden's escape, there were
accusations that militiamen working for the two warlords hired
by the CIA to get him had helped the Al Qaeda leader cross into
Pakistan. Michael Scheuer, who spent 15 years working on
Afghanistan at the CIA and at one point headed the agency's bin
Laden task force, was sharply critical of the war plan from the
start because of its reliance on Afghan allies of dubious
loyalty. ``Everyone who was cognizant of how Afghan operations
worked would have told Mr. Tenet that he was nuts,'' Scheuer
said later. ``And as it turned out, he was. ... The people we
bought, the people Mr. Tenet said we would own, let Osama bin
Laden escape from Tora Bora in eastern Afghanistan into
Pakistan.''
The American forces never had a clear idea how many Al
Qaeda fighters were arrayed against them. Estimates ranged as
high as 3,000 and as low as 500, but the consensus put the
figure around 1,000--at least until so many escaped during the
fake surrender. Regardless of the exact number of enemy
fighters, assaulting Tora Bora would have been difficult and
probably would have cost many American and Afghan lives. The
Special Operations Command's history offered this tightly
worded assessment: ``With large numbers of well-supplied,
fanatical AQ troops dug into extensive fortified positions,
Tora Bora appeared to be an extremely tough target.''
For Dalton Fury, the reward would have been worth the risk.
``In general, I definitely think it was worth the risk to the
force to assault Tora Bora for Osama bin Laden,'' he told the
committee staff. ``What other target out there, then or now,
could be more important to our nation's struggle in the global
war on terror?''
3. An Alternative Battle Plan
Rather than allowing bin Laden to escape, Franks and
Rumsfeld could have deployed American troops already in
Afghanistan on or near the border with Pakistan to
block the exits while simultaneously sending special
operations forces and their Afghan allies up the
mountains to Tora Bora. The complex mission would have
been risky, but analysis shows that it was well within
the reach and capability of the American military.
In the years following the Vietnam War, the U.S. military
developed a doctrine intended to place new constraints on when
the country went to war and to avoid a repeat of the disastrous
and prolonged conflict in Southeast Asia. In its most
simplistic form, the doctrine focused on applying overwhelming
and disproportionate military force to achieve concrete
political goals. It called for mobilizing the military and
political resources necessary for ending conflicts quickly and
leaving no loose ends. The concept was known informally as the
Powell doctrine, named for General Colin Powell, who outlined
his vision at the end of the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
The Afghan model constructed by Rumsfeld and Franks in
response to the attacks on September 11 stood the Powell
doctrine on its head. The new template was designed to deliver
a swift and economical knockout blow through airpower and the
limited application of troops on the ground. Instead of
overwhelming force, the Afghan model depended on airpower and
on highly mobile special operations forces and CIA paramilitary
teams, working in concert with opposition warlords and tribal
leaders. It was designed as unconventional warfare led by
indigenous forces, and Franks put a ceiling of 10,000 on the
number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Despite the valor of the
limited American forces, the doctrine failed to achieve one of
its most concrete political goals--eliminating the leadership
of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. The result has turned out to be
nothing close to decisive victory followed by quick withdrawal.
Assembling the size force required to apply overwhelming
force across a country as large and rugged as Afghanistan would
have taken many weeks. The only country in the region likely to
provide the major bases required to prepare an invasion by tens
of thousands of troops was Pakistan, and political
sensitivities there would have made full cooperation both
doubtful and risky for its leadership. The Pakistanis provided
limited bases for U.S. operations in the early stages of
planning and the invasion; the footprint was kept small to
avoid a public outcry. But soldiers and scholars alike have
argued that there were sufficient troops available in
Afghanistan and nearby Uzbekistan to mount a genuine assault on
Osama bin Laden's position at Tora Bora. And they could have
been augmented within about a week by reinforcements from the
Persian Gulf and the United States.
The most detailed description of the assault option was
laid out in an article in the journal Security Studies by Peter
John Paul Krause of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Entitled ``The Last Good Chance: A Reassessment of U.S.
Operations at Tora Bora,'' the article described a large-scale
operation called a block and sweep. The plan is simple enough:
One group of American forces would block the likely exit
avenues to Pakistan on the south side of Tora Bora while a
second contingent moved against Al Qaeda's positions from the
north. Simplicity should not be mistaken for sure success:
Variables like weather conditions, the effectiveness of the
remaining Al Qaeda fighters and the ability to close the escape
routes would have made the mission risky. The dangers of
attacking fortified positions manned by hardened fighters would
likely have resulted in significant U.S. casualties.
The assault would not have required thousands of
conventional forces. A large number of troops would have taken
too long to deploy and alerted Al Qaeda to the approaching
attack. ``My opinion is that bin Laden would have left even
earlier as soon as he received word that the U.S. troops were
surrounding him,'' Fury told the committee staff. ``I think he
only stayed as long as he did because he thought the mujahedin
would not aggressively pursue him.''
The preferred choice would have been a small, agile force
capable of deploying quickly and quietly and trained to operate
in difficult terrain against unconventional enemies. The U.S.
military has large numbers of soldiers and Marines who meet
those criteria--Delta Force, Green Berets, Navy Seals, Marine
special operations units and Army Rangers and paratroopers. The
effectiveness of U.S. special operations commandos, even in
small numbers, was demonstrated on December 10. Two U.S.
soldiers were able to get close enough to the Al Qaeda
positions to call in air strikes for 17 straight hours, forcing
enemy fighters to retreat and enabling the Afghan militia to
capture key terrain near bin Laden's suspected location. It was
an example of what a larger U.S. force could have accomplished,
with support from available air power.
The CIA's Berntsen had requested a battalion of Rangers,
about 800 soldiers, and been turned down by CentCom. A
battalion would have been a substantial increase in the U.S.
presence, but it probably would not have been enough to both
assault the stronghold from the north and block the exits on
the south. Krause estimated that as few as 500 troops could
have carried out the initial northern assault, with
reinforcements arriving over the course of the battle. At least
twice as many troops would have been required to execute the
blocking mission on the southern, eastern and western reaches
of Tora Bora. Krause proposed spreading about 1,500 troops to
capture or kill anyone trying to flee. O'Hanlon estimated that
closing off escape routes to Pakistan would have required 1,000
to 3,000 American troops. In all, an initial force of roughly
2,000 to 3,000 troops would have been sufficient to begin the
block-and-sweep mission, with reinforcements following as time
and circumstances allowed.
Troops Were Ready to Go
Assembling the troops to augment the handful of special ops
commandos under Fury's leadership at Tora Bora would have been
a manageable task. Franks had set the ceiling of 10,000 U.S.
troops to maintain a light footprint. Still, within that number
there were enough ready and willing to go after bin Laden. In
late November, about the time U.S. intelligence placed bin
Laden squarely at Tora Bora, more than 1,000 members of the
15th and 26th Marine Expeditionary Units, among the military's
most mobile arms, established a base southwest of Kandahar,
only a few hours flight away. They were primarily interdicting
traffic and supporting the special operations teams working
with Afghan militias. Another 1,000 troops from the Army's 10th
Mountain Division were split between a base in southern
Uzbekistan and Bagram Air Base, a short helicopter flight from
Tora Bora. The Army troops were engaged mainly in military
police functions, according to reports at the time.
Both forces are trained in unconventional warfare and could
have been redeployed rapidly for an assault. Lt. Col. Paul
Lacamera, commander of a 10th Mountain battalion, later said
that his men had been prepared to deploy anywhere in
Afghanistan since mid-November. ``We weren't just sitting there
digging holes and looking out,'' said Lacamera, whose actions
in a later assault on Al Qaeda forces won him a Silver Star.
``We were training for potential fights because eventually it
was going to come to that.''
The commander of the Marines outside Kandahar, Brig. Gen.
James N. Mattis, told a journalist that his troops could seal
off Tora Bora, but his superiors rejected the plan. Everyone
knew that such an operation would have conflicted with the
Afghan model laid down by Franks and Rumsfeld. But there were
other reasons to hesitate. One former officer told the
committee staff that the inability to get sufficient medical-
evacuation helicopters into the rough terrain was a major
stumbling block for those who considered trying to push for the
assault. He also said there were worries that bad weather would
ground transport helicopters or, worse, knock them out of the
sky.
In addition to the troops in country, a battalion of Army
Rangers was stationed in the Persian Gulf country of Oman, and
200 of them had demonstrated their abilities by parachuting
into an airfield near Kandahar at night in October. In Krause's
analysis, a battalion of about 800 soldiers from the 82nd
Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, could have
been deployed to Tora Bora in less than a week, covering the
7,000 miles in C-17 transport aircraft.
No one should underestimate the logistical difficulty and
danger of deploying even specially trained troops into hostile
territory at altitudes of 7,000 to 10,000 feet. Landing zones
for helicopters would likely have come under fire from Al Qaeda
positions and drop zones for paratroopers were few and far
between in the jagged terrain. But Chinook helicopters, the
work horse for rapid deployments, proved capable of carrying
combat troops above 11,000-foot mountain ranges as part of
Operation Anaconda, a similar block-and-sweep mission carried
out in February 2002 in eastern Afghanistan.
Former U.S. military officers said that sending American
troops into Tora Bora was discussed at various times in late
November and early December of 2001. The CIA's Afghan chief,
Hank Crumpton, made specific requests to Franks for U.S. troops
and urged President Bush not to rely on Afghan militias and
Pakistani paramilitary troops to do the job. CentCom went so
far as to develop a plan to put several thousand U.S. troops
into Tora Bora. Commanders estimated that deploying 1,000 to
3,000 American troops would have required several hundred
airlift flights by helicopters over a week or more.
DeLong defended the decision not to deploy large numbers of
American troops. ``We didn't have the lift,'' he told the
committee staff. ``We didn't have the medical capabilities. The
further we went down the road, the easier the decision got. We
wanted Afghanistan to be peaceful for Karzai to take over.
Right or not, that was the thinking behind what we did.''
The Afghan model proved effective in some instances,
particularly when Afghan opposition forces working with
American advisers were arrayed against poorly trained Taliban
foot soldiers. The precision bombs and overwhelming airpower
also played a major role in dispersing the Taliban forces and
opening the way for the rapid takeover of the country, though
critics now say scattering the Taliban simply allowed them to
regroup later. In the early days at Tora Bora, the light
footprint allowed a handful of CIA and special operations
operatives to guide bombs that killed dozens, if not hundreds,
of Al Qaeda fighters. But the model was ineffective when it
came to motivating opposition militiamen of questionable skills
and doubtful resolve to carry the fight to the biggest
concentration of Al Qaeda fighters of the war, particularly
when the jihadis were battling to protect their leader. Fewer
than 100 special operations force soldiers and CIA operatives
were unable to turn the tide against those odds.
Some critics said bin Laden escaped because the United
States relied too heavily on Afghan militias to carry the fight
forward at Tora Bora and on Pakistan's paramilitary Frontier
Corps to block any escape. As Michael O'Hanlon pointed out, our
allies did not have the same incentives to stop bin Laden and
his associates as American troops. Nor did they have the
technology and training to carry out such a difficult mission.
The responsibility for allowing the most wanted man in the
world to virtually disappear into thin air lies with the
American commanders who refused to commit the necessary U.S.
soldiers and Marines to finish the job.
The same shortage of U.S. troops allowed Mullah Mohammed
Omar and other Taliban leaders to escape. A semi-literate
leader who fled Kandahar on a motorbike, Mullah Omar has re-
emerged at the helm of the Taliban-led insurgency, which has
grown more sophisticated and lethal in recent years and now
controls swaths of Afghanistan. The Taliban, which is aligned
with a loose network of other militant groups and maintains
ties to Al Qaeda, has established shadow governments in many of
Afghanistan's provinces and is capable of mounting increasingly
complex attacks on American and NATO forces. Bruce Riedel, a
former CIA officer who helped develop the Obama
administration's Afghan policy, recently referred to the
mullah's return to power ``one of the most remarkable military
comebacks in modern history.''
Ironically, one of the guiding principles of the Afghan
model was to avoid immersing the United States in a protracted
insurgency by sending in too many troops and stirring up anti-
American sentiment. In the end, the unwillingness to bend the
operational plan to deploy the troops required to take
advantage of solid intelligence and unique circumstances to
kill or capture bin Laden paved the way for exactly what we had
hoped to avoid--a protracted insurgency that has cost more
lives than anyone estimates would have been lost in a full-
blown assault on Tora Bora. Further, the dangerous contagion of
rising violence and instability in Afghanistan has spread to
Pakistan, a nuclear-armed ally of the United States which is
now wracked by deadly terrorist bombings as it conducts its own
costly military campaign against a domestic, Taliban-related
insurgency.
The Price of Failure
Osama bin Laden's demise would not have erased the
worldwide threat from extremists. But the failure to kill or
capture him has allowed bin Laden to exert a malign influence
over events in the region and nearly 60 countries where his
followers have established extremist groups. History shows that
terrorist groups are invariably much stronger with their
charismatic leaders than without them, and the ability of bin
Laden and his terrorist organization to recover from the loss
of their Afghan sanctuary reinforces the lesson.
Eight years after its expulsion from Afghanistan, Al Qaeda
has reconstituted itself and bin Laden has survived to inspire
a new generation of extremists who have adopted and adapted the
Al Qaeda doctrine and are now capable of attacking from any
number of places. The impact of this threat is greatest in
Pakistan, where Al Qaeda's continued presence and resources
have emboldened domestic extremists waging an increasingly
bloody insurrection that threatens the stability of the
government and the region. Its training camps also have spawned
new attacks outside the region--militants trained in Pakistan
were tied to the July 2005 transit system bombings in London
and several aborted plots elsewhere in Europe.
Closer to home, the Federal Bureau of Investigation says
two recent suspected plots disrupted by U.S. authorities
involved long-time residents of the United States who had
traveled to Pakistan and trained at bases affiliated with Al
Qaeda. One of the plots involved two Chicago men accused in
late October of planning to attack the Danish newspaper that
published cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad. In the other, an
Afghan-born man who drove a shuttle bus in Denver was arrested
on suspicion of plans to detonate improvised explosives in the
United States. Court papers said the man had been trained in
weapons and explosives in Pakistan and had made nine pages of
handwritten notes on how to make and handle bombs.
For American taxpayers, the financial costs of the conflict
have been staggering. The first eight years cost an estimated
$243 billion and about $70 billion has been appropriated for
the current fiscal year--a figure that does not include any
increase in troops. But the highest price is being paid on a
daily basis in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where 68,000 American
troops and hundreds of U.S. civilians are engaged in the ninth
year of a protracted conflict and the Afghan people endure a
third decade of violence. So far, about 950 U.S. troops and
nearly 600 allied soldiers have lost their lives in Operation
Enduring Freedom, a conflict in which the outcome remains in
grave doubt in large part because the extremists behind the
violence were not eliminated in 2001.
SF Soldier aids Eastern Alliance supervising Al Qaida Prisoners DOD
Smi24.net — ежеминутные новости с ежедневным архивом. Только у нас — все главные новости дня без политической цензуры. Абсолютно все точки зрения, трезвая аналитика, цивилизованные споры и обсуждения без взаимных обвинений и оскорблений. Помните, что не у всех точка зрения совпадает с Вашей. Уважайте мнение других, даже если Вы отстаиваете свой взгляд и свою позицию. Мы не навязываем Вам своё видение, мы даём Вам срез событий дня без цензуры и без купюр. Новости, какие они есть —онлайн с поминутным архивом по всем городам и регионам России, Украины, Белоруссии и Абхазии. Smi24.net — живые новости в живом эфире! Быстрый поиск от Smi24.net — это не только возможность первым узнать, но и преимущество сообщить срочные новости мгновенно на любом языке мира и быть услышанным тут же. В любую минуту Вы можете добавить свою новость - здесь.